On 27th Feb 2012, the UK newspaper The Guardian published an article headed
“Wind power still gets lower public subsidies than fossil fuel tax breaks"
"Financial support for renewable energy under attack as gas, oil and coal still subsidised to far greater extent, new data shows”
Stuart Young Consulting Ltd was engaged by Communities Against Turbines Scotland (CATS) to examine the source and validity of the claim, which referred to an alleged subsidy for fossil fuels of £3.63 billion in 2010.
The claim in the Guardian article has no substance or merit. It is disingenuous, totally misleading and is predicated upon a highly inventive and dubious notion of “subsidy”.
The £3.63bn “fossil fuel tax breaks” referred to in the article turn out to be an imaginary relief on a level of taxation on domestic fuel which never has and almost certainly never will be levied.
On the other hand, the £0.7bn subsidy to wind with which it was compared is indeed a true subsidy to assist an unreliable technology which is likely to rise to at least £1.06bn for 2012, and to which a further £0.72bn subsidy to other Renewables and an unknown sum for Feed-In Tariffs need to be added.
| Wind -
| Wind -